Gospel. Culture. Technology. Music.

Category: Video Page 8 of 15


Judge Napolitano on Obama’s Plan Giving Unlimited power to the Federal Reserve

Mike Wallace Interviews Aldous Huxley

Mish’s Global Economic Analysis – Nerdy, But Insightful

What Should Christians Think About Global Warming?

Dr. Jay Richards untangles the question, “What should Christians think about global warming?”

A Certain Someone Got Schooled

White Horse Inn Interviews R.C. Sproul on Christless Christianity

Consider the Cost

“Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted.” – 2 Timothy 3:12

I recently watched four video lectures I have been meaning to get to for a while from Dallas Theological Seminary in which Dr. Albert Mohler spoke on the topic of the rise of the New Atheism. One of the main things I gleaned from these lectures is that since the late Medieval times, there have been three main thrusts of thought in the realm of atheism. 1) It was initially impossible not to believe in theism. 2) After the Enlightenment, it was then possible not to believe. Atheism began to grow in various ways. 3) And now in our current situation, it is, at least with the elites for the moment, impossible to believe, which is one of the reasons some are calling this new movement Enlightenment 2.0. In the West, there has been a gradual decay of belief in God that now brings us to a rather dangerous point in history. If during the period where it was possible not to believe, such awful events occurred like the Holocaust, the starvation of millions of Russians at the hands of Stalin, all resulting from or rooted in atheistic presuppositions during World War I and II, what is possible if a culture adopts the idea that it is impossible to believe in theism and that those, particularly Christians who hold the historic faith, are dangerous to humanity?

Tim Keller on MSNBC

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

What is a Disciple? – Voddie Baucham

Colbert Takes Ehrman to Task

Just a warning: being the equal opportunity offender he is, there are a couple of parts in these videos where it sounds like Colbert is mocking the claims of inerrancy and in addition makes some off-the-wall comments (it is Colbert after all). But nevertheless, he surprisingly makes some good (hilariously glaring) points and even pushes Ehrman a bit on his claims. Seems like maybe Ehrman is getting frustrated in portions of the videos? Not positive on that, but you’ll just have to watch and see for yourself.

Colbert “vs.” Ehrman (2006)

Page 8 of 15

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén