David Westerfield

Gospel. Culture. Technology. Music.


Elected to Conformity with Christ Through the Work of Christ

“Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! According to his great mercy, he has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to an inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you, who by God’s power are being guarded through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.”
1 Peter 1:3-5

Throughout Scripture, any time election is spoken of, it is always meant as encouragement for God’s people. When Peter writes at the beginning of his book in this chapter, he says, “To those who are elect exiles of the dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, according to the foreknowledge of God the Father.” The elect are chosen “according to the foreknowledge of God the Father.” When most people hear that, they assume what is meant is that God, in eternity past, foresaw who would choose Him, and therefore chose them. As Tommy Nelson from Denton Bible Church says, this is the same as throwing a dart at a wall, drawing a target around it, and calling it a bulls eye. The knowledge or foreknowledge that is spoken here is not one of facts but of persons. When God foreknows people, it is essentially the same to say that He fore-loves them. The word “know” throughout the Scriptures is used in an intimate way, not to indicate mere knowledge or facts about people, but to indicate intimate love for people. “Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived…” (Genesis 4:1) “Moses said to the Lord, “See, You say to me, ‘Lead this people!’ … Yet You said, ‘I have known you by name. You have found favor in My eyes.’ So I pray to You, if I have found favor in Your eyes, let me know Your ways.” (Exodus 33:12-13) In one instance, Adam intimately loved his wife, and she conceived. And in another instance, Moses is asking God to intimately reveal His ways to him. This is not just knowing about God, but knowing Him personally, intimately. And so it is in many instances of the Scriptures.

We who love Christ have been elected by the fore-love of God to faith, to be conformed to Christ. If God chose us in eternity past based on our choosing of Him, this would be the beginning of salvation by works. This was the core issue in the Reformation. What an incredible thought! He loved us before eternity so much that He not only saved His people by the blood of Christ for sure, but made sure that we would be brought to faith. Our faith is dependant upon God sustaining it. Peter says, “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! According to his great mercy, he has caused us to be born again…” According to God’s mercy (fore-love) He has caused us to be born again. This new birth is the birth by the Holy Spirit from death, and sin, the bondage of our souls and wills, to new life in Christ. By Christ’s blood, we have been made alive, those who believe that is. And this results in what Peter continues talking about: we, “by God’s power are being guarded through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.” This new birth is the creation in our hearts of something that was not there; belief, faith, repentance, these are all gifts of the work of Christ in the shedding of His blood. Not only is our salvation the mercy of God, but even our desire to even want Christ at all for salvation is the mercy and gift of God! God fore-loved us so much that through Christ, He raised us from death to life, and chose to do so of His own free will and free grace to us. And not only does God create faith in the hearts of His people, but as Peter says, “by God’s power [we] are being guarded through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.” God creates and sustains our faith so that we do not fall away in unbelief. See a theme here? From beginning to end, salvation is of the Lord and not our doing in any manner.” He starts, sustains, causes us to grow, and preserves us unto final salvation through the precious infinitely valuable blood of Christ. And He chose to do this from eternity in love. Our hope is not in our will power, sustaining our faith and holding on for dear life to salvation, but even our faith is upheld by the power of God’s Spirit!

And finally in 1 Peter 1:13, Peter shows that as a result of this mercy shown to us, where we are fully accepted by the Father because of the work of Christ through the application of the Holy Spirit giving us new birth to faith in Christ, he says, “Therefore, preparing your minds for action, and being sober-minded, set your hope fully on the grace that will be brought to you at the revelation of Jesus Christ.” Now because of the Father’s grace in Christ, walk in the Lord’s ways, being changed by the divine knowledge of what will be brought to us when Christ is revealed in power. What will be brought to us? Conformity to Christ! Sinlessness! Eternal life! And the greatest gift, eternal intimacy with the Creator and sustainer of all things! This is itself eternal life! What a hope!

First Cyber-war Against a Nation, Estonia

http://www.westerfunk.net/archives/secu … 0Cyberwar/

When I Say Obama and Edwards are Socialistic, This is What I Mean

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070529/ap_ … ama_health

Universal healthcare: it sounds like a great idea, healthcare for everyone right? Who doesn’t want that? While it sounds plausible, and may in the short-term fix many financial woes of those suffering from outrageous insurance rates and unbearable co-pays, the long-term problem is that healthcare quality will suffer dramatically. And to be honest, despite the high cost of healthcare, we have one of the best quality systems in the world. If we follow the example of those European nations who have moved to universal healthcare though, getting in for cancer treatment will take six weeks. Literally. I know this because a friend of mine had a mother in Sweden who was diagnosed with cancer but could not get in to see the doctor for six weeks because of bureaucratic red tape as a result of the universalization of healthcare. She died shortly thereafter.

Obama’s (and Edwards) solution to healthcare is to excessively tax the rich and give to the poor to pay for this. In most classic economics classes (except for those redefining the meaning of these terms like at Harvard, Yale, and GWU), taking from the rich and giving to the poor is called socialism. It is a move away from capitalism. And I guarantee healthcare will never be the same if this ever becomes policy. This is what I mean when I say Obama is socialistic. And when I say that I guess you could say what I mean is neo-socialism, not old time Soviet Socialism. Instead of this new kind of socialism being applied to solve our healthcare woes, we need policies that will address the current healthcare market and fix those problems instead of scrapping it altogether.

Are We Really This Complacent Now?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070524/ts_ … wards_dc_1

After only five years since 9/11, we now have politicians like John Edwards saying, “The war on terror is a slogan designed only for politics, not a strategy to make America safe. It’s a bumper sticker, not a plan.” This is in the words of Bush today, “Naive.” I agree. How could we be this near-sighted? Six terrorists were recently thwarted in their plot to hit Fort Dix a few weeks ago. They are here and waiting to attack, plotting attacks.

Excellent

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070522/ts_ … ms_poll_dc

Also:

http://www.westerfunk.net/archives/secu … erica%201/
http://www.westerfunk.net/archives/secu … erica%202/
http://www.westerfunk.net/archives/secu … erica%203/

In DC This Week

Just for everyone’s information, I will be in DC this week for Documentum training. Today I went to the Mall, walked around and ate in China Town. Very nice. The orange chicken was great. The FBI building sure is locked down. I cannot believe how big some of these buildings are …

Scientists Changing Their Minds on Man-made Global Warming

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm? … ;Issue_id=

Jerry Falwell Has Passed Away

AP news just reported that Jerry Falwell passed away at 73. And while I doctrinally and philosophically have disagreed with Falwell on his tactics in confronting an increasingly paganizing post-modern culture with the Gospel, I do believe he loved Christ, preached the Gospel, and that many were saved through his ministry by the Grace of God in the cross of Christ. As the body of Christ, we should mourn the loss of someone I consider to be a brother, who though he had many strong arguments with Calvinists and unbelievers to the point of being unloving and unmerciful (haven’t we all?), he was indeed a soldier of the Lord and is now with Him (based upon his profession of faith). I agreed with most of his assessments about culture and can stand with him on about 90% to 95% of theological issues concerning Christianity, but disagreed strongly with his application of grace to an unbelieving world, seeing him as coming off arrogant, self-righteous, and unkind (this is what unbelievers have told me frequently of Falwell and what I have observed). However, I glorify God that he confessed that Jesus was the Christ, the Son of God, and that He is with Him.

How Are Statements Like This Not Racist?

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtra … ost_1.html

George Lopez, according to this LA Times blog entry, after his show was canceled, is quoted as saying, “TV just became really, really white again.” Let’s turn the tables around and theoretically say that if 24 was canceled and Kiefer Sutherland stated in anger, “TV just became really, really black again,” or “TV just became really, really Mexican again.” Wouldn’t you hear from Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson or the LULAC in about two seconds on MSNBC or CNN about how racist Sutherland is and what a Nazi bigot he is?

Why is it there is no outrage of the same nature as when Imus made his comments and was fired, essentially being silenced? To be consistent with the Imus firing, shouldn’t Lopez be silenced as well in the form of a discrimination lawsuit or something? No, rather what would happen is he would say he was being discriminated against and would sue those attempting to sue him, and probably win! The double-standards in our society seem to be increasing. One guy says something, and gets fired. Another guy can say what he wants without fear of retribution. In fact, he’ll probably somehow make money off of the deal. Racism is alive and well in our society, just in a different form than before. Pay attention here, Lopez’s statement is blatantly racist, and going totally unchecked. That’s the way these things go I guess … just some observations.

It Is Official: Iran is Enriching Uranium on an Industrial Scale Now

http://www.westerfunk.net/archives/terr … ar%20Work/

Of particular interest is the Director General of the IAEA who was quoted in the article as saying: “We believe they pretty much have the knowledge about how to enrich. From now on, it is simply a question of perfecting that knowledge. People will not like to hear it, but that’s a fact.” The reason this is interesting is because he was one of the guys who clashed with the Bush administration about whether or not Iraq was resuming nuclear activity, according to the article. But about Iran he is saying, “People will not like to hear it, but that’s a fact.”

Page 88 of 118

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén